State v. Schmid

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 14

Syllabus

The jury's rejection of appellant's not guilty by reason of insanity defense was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Both sides presented expert testimony, and the jury credited the State's expert over appellant's. Further, appellant's conviction for felonious assault was supported by the evidence; the victim's broken jaw and torn mouth skin constituted serious physical harm. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it permitted testimony that appellant had stopped taking his medications before the incidents. Judgment affirmed.