State v. Schlund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that State’s motion to disqualify defendant’s counsel because of conflict of interest affects peripheral matter of counsel qualified to represent defendant rather than subject matter of case, as required in Jarrett v. Eichler, 244 Neb. 310, 506 N.W.2d 682 (1993)
• order disqualifying public defender did not affect substantial right of defendant, and thus was not final, appeal- able order that created appellate jurisdiction; when counsel is court appointed, defendant does not have constitutional right to counsel of his or her choice
• order disqualifying public defender did not affect substantial right of defendant, and thus was not final, appeal- able order that created appellate jurisdiction; when counsel is court appointed, defendant does not have constitutional right to counsel of his or her choice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).