State v. Schifsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that admission of testimony by officers concerning wife’s statements to them did not violate section 595.02
• stating both that “[a] witness, of course, is one who has been sworn according to law[,]” and that “testimony means the statement made by the witness under oath in the trial of a case or in a legal proceeding”
• error for court to answer jury's questions in open court, but without counsel or defendant present
• discussing both hearsay and marital privilege issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).