State v. Scheler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 38 U.S.C. § 5110(a) and (b)(1) do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment
• holding that 38 U.S.C. § 5110(a) and (b)(1) do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment
• holding that § 5110(b)(1) \applies only to those awards of disability compensation actually based on a claim filed within one year after the veteran's separation\
• holding that an application that had been previously denied could not preserve an effective date for a later grant of benefits based on a new application
• “the word therefor ... mean[s] the thing previously discussed, understood, or under discussion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).