Court of Appeals of Arizona· 6/27/2002
State v. Schaffer
Citations
- 48 P.3d 1202
- 202 Ariz. 592
- 376 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 6
- 2002 Ariz. App. LEXIS 98
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding a defendant’s prosthetic arm may be considered a “dangerous instrument” for purposes of charging aggravated assault
- based on a prosthetic device’s characteristics and the “circumstances in which it is used,” it may properly be considered a “dangerous instrument”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cecil, Michael, Noyes, Patterson, Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-01-14· cited 19×
- State v. HardySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-09· cited 11×
- MARIO W. v. KaipioCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-10-27· cited 5×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-12-16· cited 3×
- State of Arizona v. Amy Kay GustafsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-10-16· cited 2×
- State of Arizona v. Scott Allen KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-01-14
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.