State v. Scanlan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “defendant does not claim a possessory or property interest to the items seized, nor does he claim to have the same interest to the premises” where the evidence was found

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garcia
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-08-10· cited 82×
• State v. Wilson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1999-10-28· cited 79×
• State v. Pattioay
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-16· cited 63×
• State v. Taua
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-06-28· cited 13×
• State v. Przeradski
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1984-02-03· cited 10×
• State v. Kolia
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2007-08-16· cited 6×
• State v. Tau'a
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-06-28· cited 6×
• State v. Figaroa
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1982-09-17· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• State v. Kaaheena
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 84×
• State v. Kender
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1979-01-05· cited 42×
• State v. Dias
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1980-04-10· cited 38×
• Blackburn v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1978-02-17· cited 32×
• State v. Abordo
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1979-06-19· cited 31×