State v. Saylor

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 1025

Syllabus

Appellant, following negotiations, pleaded guilty to several drug related offenses. He was sentenced to an aggregate term of twelve and one-half years in prison, with the sentence including the imposition of consecutive service. The trial court did not consider improper sentencing factors. Further, the consecutive sentences are not contrary to law, nor can we conclude by clear and convincing evidence that the record does not support the consecutive sentences. Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., concurring.)