State v. Saye

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that trial court properly relied upon wife’s non-economic contributions as primary homemaker and caretaker for children when fashioning property settlement
• explaining that “a trial court should award a property settlement to be effected immediately where practicable”
• “[g]iven the broad [statutory] definition of ‘marital property’ ... the trial court did not unsustainably exercise its discretion by classifying the [husband’s] interest in certain real estate parcels, timeshares and [a] dental practice as marital property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).