State v. Sawyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we would decide, in the first instance, whether the defendant’s conduct constituted consent for the police to enter her apartment because “the parties fully litigated the issue below, and because the essential facts are not in dispute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Akuba
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-08-18· cited 47×
• State v. Hight
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-09-06· cited 43×
• State v. Orde
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-11-30· cited 16×
• State v. Gordon
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-04-09· cited 13×
• State v. Tyler Boyer
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-02-12· cited 8×
• State v. Grey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-12-17· cited 7×
• Chapman v. Douglas
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-03-29· cited 6×
• State v. Tarasuik
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-05-20· cited 6×
• State v. Jason Czekalski
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2017-04-11· cited 5×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Michigan v. Long
  Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
• State v. Ball
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-12-12· cited 762×
• Appeal of Cote
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-06-06· cited 32×
• State v. MacDonald
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-12-30· cited 16×
• State v. Ricci
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-10-20· cited 15×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-06-28· cited 8×
• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1990-03-08· cited 8×
• State v. Baroudi
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-04-13· cited 7×
• State v. Diaz
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-10-04· cited 5×