State v. Savors
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 894
Syllabus
CRIMINAL – Appellant failed to demonstrate presumptive prejudice to establish constitutional speedy trial violation due to his incarceration during Ohio's Covid-19 tolling period Appellant failed to demonstrate actual prejudice resulting from six-month delay resulting from the state's failure to procure Appellant from federal custody as Appellant was being held by federal authorities.
Judges: D'Apolito
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- City of Brecksville v. CookOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-04· cited 325×
- State v. ButcherOhio Supreme Court· 1986-11-26· cited 229×
- State v. MacDonaldOhio Supreme Court· 1976-11-17· cited 174×
- State v. Long (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-11-24· cited 69×
- In re Disqualification of FleegleOhio Supreme Court· 2020-12-10· cited 31×
- State v. ShabazzOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-12· cited 27×
- State v. TatumOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-20· cited 21×
- State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-15· cited 16×
- State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-28· cited 10×
- State v. GageCourt of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County· 2018-01-26· cited 10×
- State v. ShelbyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-31· cited 6×
- State v. PaigeOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-25· cited 6×
- State v. McGeeOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.