Skip to main content

State v. Saunders

Citations

  • 542 N.W.2d 67
  • 1996 Minn. App. LEXIS 60
  • 1996 WL 12623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address issues not within precise legal question certified for review
  • ‘Where the certified question is inaccurately stated, the reviewing court may revise the question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harten, Schumacher, Forsberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.