Skip to main content

State v. Saucier

Citations

  • 421 A.2d 57
  • 1980 Me. LEXIS 691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the former gross sexual misconduct statute, which had no mens rea requirement, was “based on the premise that one person cannot accidentally or innocently induce another person to engage in sexual intercourse by means of a threat”
  • recognizing that the former gross sexual misconduct statute, which had no mens rea requirement, was “based on the premise that one person cannot accidentally or innocently induce another person to engage in sexual intercourse by means of a threat”
  • statute based on premise that one person cannot accidentally or innocently induce another to engage in sexual intercourse by means of a threat
  • statute based on premise that one person cannot accidentally or innocently induce another to engage in sexual intercourse by means of a threat

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKusick, Wer-Nick, Godfrey, Nichols, Glass-Man, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.