State v. Sargent
Citations
- 62 Wash. 692
- 114 P. 868
- 1911 Wash. LEXIS 768
Syllabus
<p>Rape — Statutory Rape — Defenses—Previous Chaste Character. Under an information charging rape on or about March 1st, by carnally knowing a female child between 15 and 18 years of age, of previous chaste character, where the prosecutor elected an act of January 20th, the defense that the prosecutrix was not then of chaste character, by reason of previous relations with the accused, is not available, where all their acts occurred in the same county, within one month; since any one of the acts would have sustained a con vietion under the information.</p>
Judges: Crow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court· 1990-07-26· cited 730×
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court· 1911-12-19· cited 56×
- State v. StorrsWashington Supreme Court· 1920-10-13· cited 24×
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-01-25· cited 18×
- State v. RasmussenWashington Supreme Court· 1923-05-18· cited 7×
- State v. TildenWashington Supreme Court· 1914-05-05· cited 6×
- Marchand v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1925-01-22· cited 4×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.