Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 5/1/2018
State v. Santillan
Citations
- 815 S.E.2d 690
Syllabus
Invocation of Right to Counsel Further Questioning By Law Enforcement Remand for Further Findings Admission of Incriminating Rap Lyrics Plain Error Conceded Error at Sentencing
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- vacating the defendant’s two sentences and remanding for a new sentence hearing upon the State’s concession “the trial court failed to make sufficient findings to support the two sentences”
- vacating the defendant’s two sentences and remanding for a new sentence hearing upon the State’s concession “the trial court failed to make sufficient findings to support the two sentences”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dietz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Brantley-PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-07-06
- State v. BallardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-05-03
- State v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-03-19
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-12-20
- State v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2026-02-18
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.