State v. Santiago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecution on weapons charge does not give rise to double jeopardy clause violation after administrative discipline by prison officials
• “administrative sanctions, like those meted out to the defendant in this case, serve the purpose of maintaining institutional order and security and do not give rise to double jeopardy clause violations.”
• prosecution on weapons charge after administrative discipline by prison officials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Crawford
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-28· cited 53×
• Ex Parte Hernandez
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 23×
• State v. Bornstein
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-03-10· cited 1×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2017-01-27

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Benton v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
• Brown v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
• United States v. Halper
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
• United States v. Gene Francis Newby and Raynaldo Barber. Gene Francis Newby (Appellant in No. 92-5711). Raynaldo Barber (Appellant in No. 92-5712)
  Third Circuit· 1993-12-29· cited 149×
• State v. John
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-04-11· cited 139×
• United States v. Alberto Hernandez-Fundora
  Second Circuit· 1995-06-22· cited 106×
• State v. Hickam
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-26· cited 70×
• State v. Faust
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-25· cited 45×
• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-04-25· cited 42×
• State v. Wilkes
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-03-05· cited 19×
• State v. Walker
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-07-08· cited 15×