State v. Sanseverino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying new rule in State v. Salamon, 287 Conn. 509, 949 A.2d 1092 (2008), to pend- ing cases
• overruled in part on other grounds by State v. DeJesus, 288 Conn. 418, 953 A.2d 45 (2008)
• overruled in part on other grounds by State v. DeJesus, 288 Conn. 418, 953 A.2d 45 (2008)
• when cases were equally likely to arouse emotions of jurors, trial court did not abuse discretion when it denied defen- dant’s motion to sever cases
• \[w]e consistently have found joinder to be proper if we have concluded that the evidence of other crimes or uncharged misconduct would have been cross admissible at separate trials\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).