Oregon Supreme Court· 3/29/2007
State v. Sandoval
Citations
- 156 P.3d 60
- 342 Or. 506
- 2007 Ore. LEXIS 261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- abrogating earlier case interpreting statute because it did not examine the words of the statute and it relied on irrelevant parts of the legislative history
- declining to apply pre-PGE case law concerning a duty of retreat where analytical flow of prior opinion was “distinctly odd” and was not grounded in the text of the controlling statutes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Muniz, Carson, Gillette, Durham, Balmer, Kistler, Walters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mastriano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court· 2007-05-24· cited 57×
- Worman v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-15· cited 15×
- Severy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 14×
- State v. GruverCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-14· cited 7×
- Gilley v. MorrowNinth Circuit· 2007-08-31· cited 4×
- State v. GreinierCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-05· cited 2×
- State v. Mosqueda-Rivera-BurdetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-15· cited 2×
- State v. CranstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-29· cited 1×
- State v. FolksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-07
- State v. LangCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-09-12
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-28
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.