State v. Sandon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Once the defendant has been given the appeal to which he has a right [i.e., in the Court of Appeals], state remedies have been exhausted”
• both indicating that state prisoners need not petition for review by the state’s highest court for their state remedies to be deemed exhausted for the purpose of federal habeas
• in non-capital cases, state remedies are exhausted by review by the court of appeals
• issues decided by the Court of Appeals that are not presented to the Supreme Court in a petition for review are no longer open to substantive review in the Supreme Court, or in any other court in Arizona
• absent certain statutory exceptions, “issues decided by the Court of Appeals, even though they had not been presented to this Court in a petition for review, are no longer open to substantive review in this Court, or in any other court in Arizona”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).