State v. Sanders
Citations
- 167 N.E.3d 561
- 2021 Ohio 275
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to suppress upon finding the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applied where there was no reason for anyone involved in the search of appellant's residence to believe appellant's three-year community control term had been rendered \void\ at the time his probation officer conducted the search, as there would be no deterrent effect on future Fourth Amendment violations by suppressing the resulting evidence obtained during the search.
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-01-14· cited 1,549×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 1,497×
- State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 672×
- State v. Harper (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-14· cited 319×
- State v. CastagnolaOhio Supreme Court· 2015-04-28· cited 136×
- United States v. SparksFirst Circuit· 2013-03-26· cited 68×
- State v. DurhamOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-28· cited 68×
- State v. Hitchcock (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-08-15· cited 59×
- State v. Dibble (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-02-20· cited 30×
- State v. Johnson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-13· cited 26×
- State v. ErtelOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-25· cited 11×
- State v. FrostOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-03· cited 10×
- State v. FlemingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.