State v. Sanders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statements that subject the declarant to criminal punishment are admissible “because experience teaches that it is unlikely that [a person] would so declare unless it were true”
• the district court may consider “various possible motivations” for the declarant to make the hearsay statement that cut against the application of the statement-against-interest exception, including “concern for assisting the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Long
  Utah Supreme Court· 1986-06-20· cited 164×
• Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.
  Utah Supreme Court· 2003-11-14· cited 65×
• State v. Villarreal
  Utah Supreme Court· 1995-01-25· cited 33×
• State v. Gervais
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1974-04-09· cited 29×
• State v. Rhinehart
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2006-12-29· cited 25×
• State v. Lovato
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-06-07· cited 19×
• Fish v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1976-05-10· cited 15×
• State v. Alonzo
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1997-01-09· cited 14×
• State v. Wulffenstein
  Utah Supreme Court· 1986-02-06· cited 13×
• State v. Clopten
  Utah Supreme Court· 2015-09-04· cited 12×
• State v. Dalton
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2014-03-27· cited 12×
• State v. Kamrowskli
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2015-04-02· cited 8×
• State v. Kamrowski
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2015-04-02· cited 7×
• State v. Ruiz
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2014-06-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Raymond R. Fowle v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1969-04-14· cited 104×
• State v. Rosenbaum
  Utah Supreme Court· 1969-01-30· cited 10×