State v. Sanchez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e will not presume the jury reads written instructions alone or that the jury was sufficiently literate to comprehend the instructions accurately.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Levy
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-04-13· cited 366×
• In Re Crace
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-07-28· cited 19×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Crace
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-07-28· cited 19×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Drope v. Missouri
  Supreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
• State v. McFarland
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
• Estelle v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
• State v. WWJ Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 201×
• State v. Byrd
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-01-19· cited 184×
• State v. Foster
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 113×
• State v. Eastmond
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 86×
• United States v. Noble
  Third Circuit· 1946-05-08· cited 82×
• Stephen Ho v. Thomas L. Carey, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-06-05· cited 48×
• People of the Territory of Guam v. Bobby G. Marquez
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-05-12· cited 39×
• Purdy v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1977-12-01· cited 31×
• State v. Marking
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-21· cited 31×
• State v. Iosefa
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1994-10-05· cited 28×
• State v. Norris
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1985-05-09· cited 19×
• State v. Lindsey
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-01-23· cited 11×
• State v. Stevens
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-06-20· cited 4×