State v. Samulski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting this contention because it is derived from permanent taking cases, and explaining that in a temporary taking case, the time of the taking is the full period during which governmental action constrained the owner’s property rights
• calculating lost rents through February 1997 as $841,839
• accrual at end of taking period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).