State v. Samuel Pennock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that victim’s written statement was cumulative because it only repeated victim’s properly-admitted oral statement
• stating that there must be error to have plain error
• “Our only function on review is to determine whether a reasonable person could have reached the same decision as the trial court on the basis of the evidence before it.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).