Skip to main content

State v. Sample

Citations

  • 228 A.3d 171
  • 468 Md. 560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the standard for authentication of electronic evidence is by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning “more likely than not”
  • holding the standard for authentication of electronic evidence is by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning “more likely than not”
  • “The State was not required to eliminate all possibilities that were inconsistent with authenticity, or prove beyond any question” that the defendant was the 12 one who used the communication device
  • “The State was not required to eliminate all possibilities that were inconsistent with authenticity, or prove beyond any question” that the defendant was the 12 one who used the communication device

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.