State v. Sam Neely

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute of limitations tolls during a postconviction motion because, otherwise, a defendant could attack the reinstated conviction while the state could not rescind from its side of the bargain
• holding that the statute of limitations tolls during a postconviction motion because, otherwise, a defendant could attack the reinstated conviction while the state could not rescind from its side of the bargain
• stating that an unconditional nolle prosequi resulting in dismissal of the indictment required “beginning a new case against the accused”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).