State v. Salisbury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, that where defendant did not appear at trial and surety attempted to find him, recognizance was not accepted to enrich the treasury, but to instead enforce the criminal laws that the defendant appear for trial and sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Armstrong
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-09-02· cited 23×
• State v. Norton
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1961-06-30· cited 18×
• State v. Zylstra
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1978-03-22· cited 14×
• Allegheny Mutual Casualty Co. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-04-06· cited 12×
• State v. Savage
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1971-01-11· cited 11×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1973-03-12· cited 8×
• State v. Foster
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1974-07-01· cited 8×
• Perry v. Aversman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-04-26· cited 8×
• State v. Carroll
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-07-06· cited 6×
• State v. Daigle
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1969-07-14· cited 6×
• State v. Michael R. Thomas Bail Bond Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2012-05-09· cited 6×
• State v. Canania
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-05-11· cited 5×
• State v. Tennyson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-06-01· cited 5×
• State v. Argonaut Insurance Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-08-17· cited 4×
• State v. Gray
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-09-06· cited 4×
• Mills v. Town of Kingstree
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1960-06-29· cited 3×
• State v. Batson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-02-10· cited 2×
• State ex rel. Wright v. Poelker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1977-03-01· cited 1×
• State v. Mercer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1979-06-29· cited 1×
• State v. Wilson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-08-15· cited 1×