Skip to main content
· 4/18/2006

State v. Sale

Citations

  • 133 P.3d 815
  • 110 Haw. 386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting application of Gray based on state evidentiary rule that expressly proscribes inference from privilege assertion
  • defendant required to testify Erst based in part on defense counsel's inability to secure presence of other defense witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Watanabe, Nakamura

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.