State v. Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that statements made for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment “are admissible . . . if the evidence suggests that the child knew she was speaking to medical personnel and that it was important she tell the truth”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-07-20· cited 64×
• State v. Gates
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-08-03· cited 35×
• State v. Krasky
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-05-24· cited 16×
• State v. Gorman
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-07-20· cited 5×