State v. Sain-Dunham
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 3214
Syllabus
Appellant's convictions for violating a protection order and disorderly conduct were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the State, was sufficient to demonstrate that appellant acted recklessly in violating the terms of a protection order by living on the back patio at the protected person's residence and by causing inconvenience and annoyance to the arresting officers by yelling rude and offensive language toward them. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.