State v. Saephan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing based in part on evidence that appellant had some recognition of the need to engage in certain life-sustaining activities
• reversing commitment even though, at the time of the hearing, the appellant had no money, food, lodging, or appropriate clothing; at the hearing, he “identified various persons and entities he planned to ask for assistance in obtaining money, food, or shelter if released”
• evidence that an allegedly mentally ill person “recognizes the necessity of some activity on his part to provide for his survival” supports a finding that the person can provide for basic needs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).