North Dakota Supreme Court· 3/17/1983
State v. Sadowski
Citations
- 331 N.W.2d 274
- 1983 N.D. LEXIS 254
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where a defendant's judgment of conviction is null and void because of trial court's lack of jurisdiction to adjudge the defendant guilty, double jeopardy does not bar a subsequent prosecution for the same offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Erickstad, Paulson, Pederson, Sand, Vande, Walle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-03-03· cited 1,194×
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 712×
- Farrington v. New England Investment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1890-04-01· cited 37×
- State v. RogersNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1926-06-14· cited 31×
- Youmans v. HannaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1916-12-02· cited 21×
- Jefferson v. SweatSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-12-07· cited 19×
- State ex rel. Bockmeier v. ElyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1907-11-07· cited 17×
- State v. SadowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-01-27· cited 10×
- State v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1977-09-06· cited 4×
- State v. MayhewNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1973-05-11· cited 2×
- State v. RitzSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1923-12-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.