State v. Saavedra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• presuming that the prosecutor could not take the required evaluation to make an informed decision whether to seek forfeiture until the prosecutor actually received the weapon or notice of the seizure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• New Jersey DYFS v. SS
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-07-01· cited 60×
• State v. Volpini
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-06-18· cited 13×
• State v. Perkins
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-03-10· cited 8×
• State v. Johnson
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-06-11· cited 7×
• Matter of Return of Weapons of Jwd
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-05-15· cited 6×
• Pelow v. Pelow
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-11-08· cited 4×
• State v. Masculin
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-07-01· cited 2×
• State v. Warrick
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-03-17· cited 2×
• State v. Burdin
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-01-23· cited 2×
• State v. McGovern
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-05-17· cited 2×
• In re the Seized Firearms Identification Card of Hand
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-03-18· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wene v. Meyner
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1953-07-09· cited 79×
• Fischer v. Fischer
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1953-06-25· cited 43×