State v. Rypkema

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting statute demonstrates legislative concern for privacy and suppressing evidence secured in violation of state night-time search statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Foncette
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-08-11· cited 8×
• Soza v. Marner
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-10-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Watson
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-11-30· cited 36×
• Solis v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1966-01-04· cited 22×
• State v. Eichorn
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-12-11· cited 20×
• Tuttle v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-06-12· cited 20×
• State v. Jackson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-10-24· cited 14×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-10-08· cited 5×