State v. Ryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• failure to use test Breathalyzer with ampul from same batch as that used to test defendant's breath renders test results inadmissible
• failure to use test Breathalyzer with ampul from same batch as that used to test defendant's breath renders test results inadmissible
• breath test inadmissible because State could not show that machine’s ampoule maintenance requirements were met at time of test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Straka
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 62×
• Mairs v. Department of Licensing
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-07-12· cited 30×
• State v. Watson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-06-30· cited 11×
• State v. Keller
  Washington Supreme Court· 2024-04-04· cited 10×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Baker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1960-10-06· cited 147×
• State v. Peterson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-01-19· cited 17×