Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/22/2011
State v. Rutledge
Citations
- 260 P.3d 532
- 243 Or. App. 603
- 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 859
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that there was no reasonable 40 State v. Miller suspicion of drug possession when the defendant “had just left a motel that the police believed was involved in drug activity, was in a car with a person suspected of drug activ- ity, and acted nervously when asked about her purse”
- finding officer had no reasonable suspicion to seize passenger who “had just left a motel that the police believed was involved in drug activity, was in a car with a person suspected of drug activity, and acted nervously”
- facts were insufficient to justify reasonable suspicion where the defendant “had just left a motel that the police believed was involved in drug activity, [and] was in a car with a person suspected of drug activity”
- no reasonable suspicion of narcotics when the defendant “had just left a motel that the police believed was involved in drug activity, was in a car with a person suspected of drug activity, and acted nervously when asked about her purse”
- facts were insufficient to establish reasonable suspicion where the defendant “had just left a motel that the police believed was involved in drug activity, was in a car with a person suspected of drug activity, and acted nervously when asked about her purse”
- facts were insufficient to establish reasonable suspicion where the defendant “had just left a motel that the police believed was involved in drug activity, was in a car with a person suspected of drug activity, and acted nervously when asked about her purse”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BertschCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-11· cited 24×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-31· cited 13×
- State v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-12· cited 13×
- State v. Espinoza-BarraganCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-05· cited 12×
- State v. HallamCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-09· cited 12×
- State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 10×
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-22· cited 10×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-16· cited 8×
- State v. Meza-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-30· cited 7×
- State v. WestcottCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-30· cited 7×
- State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-05· cited 3×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-13· cited 3×
- State v. RhyneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-21· cited 1×
- State v. HeaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-29· cited 1×
- State of Iowa v. Bounmy BounmyCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2017-02-08
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.