State v. Rutherford
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 1309
Syllabus
Sufficient evidence of unlawful conduct existed to justify the investigative stop of the car appellant was driving. A 911 caller and the information provided in the call contained sufficient indicia of reliability to justify a lawful stop. The officer also had sufficient reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop the car matching the description given by the 911 caller without identifying the driver prior to the stop. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2014-04-22· cited 1,110×
- City of Maumee v. WeisnerOhio Supreme Court· 1999-12-22· cited 485×
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-10-01· cited 375×
- State v. Leak (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-01-20· cited 135×
- State v. PickettOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-14· cited 10×
- State v. CookOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-27· cited 4×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-25· cited 4×
- State v. GregoryOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.