State v. Rutherford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• state trooper did not have subjective probable cause to believe that defendant was driving under the influence of intoxicants before he administered field sobriety after stopping defendant for speeding and driving carelessly
• court can, in some instances, infer subjective probable cause from an officer’s conduct
• court can, in some instances, infer subjective probable cause from an officer's conduct
• state trooper did not have subjective probable cause to believe that defendant was driving under the influence of intoxicants before he administered field sobriety after stopping defendant for speeding and driving carelessly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Floyd v. City of Crystal Springs
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1999-11-24· cited 198×
• State v. Gilkey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-01-24· cited 16×
• Graham Alexander Floyd v. City of Crystal Springs, Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1998-07-28
• State v. McCrary
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-22

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Owens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
• State v. Nagel
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 119×
• State v. Belt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 58×
• State v. Jacobus
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 20×
• State v. Bickford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-25· cited 11×
• Winroth v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-01· cited 9×
• Oregon v. Niles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-07-17· cited 8×
• State v. Demus
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-06-19· cited 5×