State v. Rutherford

Citations

• 2026 Ohio 1895

Syllabus

The State presented substantial evidence that appellant violated the conditions of his community control sanctions. While appellant argues that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences because it failed to give adequate notice at his original sentencing that consecutive sentences were a possibility, he failed to provide a transcript of his original sentencing. Therefore, we must presume regularity in the proceedings before the trial court. Judgment affirmed.