State v. Rust
Citations
- 119 Wash. 480
- 206 P. 33
- 1922 Wash. LEXIS 831
Syllabus
<p>Physicians and Surgeons (4-1, 5) — Registration or License— Statutes — “Osteopaths”—Optometry. Section 15 of the Optometry Act [Rem. Comp. Stat., § 10159] excepting from its operation “any regularly licensed occulist or physician who is regularly licensed to practice medicine,” has no application to osteopathic practitioners, who, under the history of the legislature of the state are not regularly licensed to practice medicine.</p> <p>Same (4-1, 5). The practice of osteopathy does not include the practice of optometry, although an osteopath may treat the eye osteopathically.</p>
Judges: Mitchell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Woodson v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 59×
- Waldo v. PoeW.D. Washington· 1926-06-28· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Finch v. EustaceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1925-02-07· cited 8×
- Sachs v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1938-05-31· cited 3×
- Woodson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-01-22· cited 2×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.