Superior Court of Delaware· 10/8/1996
State v. Russo
Citations
- 700 A.2d 161
- 1996 WL 910025
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] recantation is received with great caution in a sexual misconduct case when the recanting witness is a relative of the defendant.”
- “A motion for a new trial based on a witness’ recantation is generally viewed with suspicion. This is because a recantation has traditionally been viewed as the ‘product of prison atmosphere to be received with great caution.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-09-10· cited 33×
- Williams v. Government of the Virgin IslandsVirgin Islands· 2003-05-30· cited 9×
- State of Delaware v. Wright.Superior Court of Delaware· 2014-08-19
- State v. BensonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-05-31
- State v. WardSuperior Court of Delaware· 2019-11-19
- Purnell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2021-06-17
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.