Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 9/17/2012
State v. Rushton
Citations
- 820 N.W.2d 287
- 2012 WL 4052386
- 2012 Minn. App. LEXIS 106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing aggravated sentence when district court did not articulate a substantial and compelling reason to justify sentencing departure because it did not consider sentence to be a departure from guidelines
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hooten, Ross, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-05-09· cited 115×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-11-19· cited 62×
- State v. GellerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-24· cited 53×
- State v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-10-28· cited 24×
- State v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-06-21· cited 18×
- State v. PetersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-07-05· cited 12×
- State v. HodgesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-08-13· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.