State v. Rushing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that \the legislative purpose to impose absolute liability should not be discerned lightly by the courts\
• affirming a conviction for welfare fraud although the prosecution had offered no direct evidence of the defendant’s state of mind

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Eastman
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-03-15· cited 166×
• State v. Nesmith
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-04-12· cited 57×
• Trivectra v. Ushijima
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2006-09-11· cited 51×
• State v. Sadino
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-03-25· cited 44×
• State v. Gonzalez.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-11-28· cited 39×
• State v. Bayly
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-05-29· cited 39×
• State v. Torres
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1983-03-08· cited 13×
• State v. Kane
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1982-10-25· cited 13×
• State v. Veikoso
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-09-12· cited 10×
• State v. Manipon
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1981-10-07· cited 5×
• State v. Keawemauhili
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2007-04-05· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tot v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1943-06-07· cited 998×
• State v. Hernandez
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1980-01-23· cited 50×
• State v. Yabusaki
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1977-10-26· cited 38×
• State v. Hopkins
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1979-03-28· cited 33×
• State v. Stuart
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1970-03-12· cited 32×
• State v. Laurie
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1976-04-01· cited 25×
• State v. Dwyer
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1977-02-09· cited 9×