Supreme Court of New Jersey· 3/7/1966
State v. Rush
Citations
- 217 A.2d 441
- 46 N.J. 399
- 21 A.L.R. 3d 804
- 1966 N.J. LEXIS 266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that counties meet the costs of prosecutions and are considered subdivisions of the state
- holding counties responsible for paying court appointed attorneys
- noting this Court’s authority to require attorneys to defend indigents without charge
- noting this Court's authority to require attorneys to defend indigents without charge
- involuntarily appointed counsel was entitled to \60% of the fee a client of ordinary means would pay an attorney of modest financial success\
- “We do no more than recognize the desirability, in the public interest, for an opportunity for the other branches of government and the agencies concerned to consider the problem.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weintraub, C
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
151 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LeonardisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-05-31· cited 268×
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
- Ex Parte GraysonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1985-05-10· cited 207×
- In Interest of DBSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-05-16· cited 166×
- McKeown-Brand v. Trump Castle Hotel & CasinoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-01· cited 160×
- Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATTSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-05-10· cited 143×
- Hallford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-12-10· cited 136×
- Martin County, Florida v. Makemson Et Al.; And Okeechobee County, Florida v. Dennis Et Al.Supreme Court· 1987-01-12· cited 112×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-06-12· cited 110×
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-03-08· cited 110×
- People Ex Rel. Conn v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-08-16· cited 97×
- State Ex Rel. Stephan v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-12-15· cited 93×
- In Re Application of LiVolsiSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-04-13· cited 93×
- State v. LaurickSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-06-25· cited 87×
- In Re Claim of Rehm and FaesserNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-07-24· cited 85×
- Ramos Acevedo v. Tribunal Superior, Sala de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1993-06-14· cited 79×
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-07-31· cited 78×
- Cohen v. Radio-Electronics Officers Union District 3Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-08-14· cited 75×
- State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court· 1981-05-06· cited 72×
- State Ex Rel. Partain v. OakleyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1976-07-23· cited 68×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court· 1942-06-01· cited 1,154×
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court· 1867-01-14· cited 795×
- United States v. Edward J. Dillon, Petition of Manley B. StrayerNinth Circuit· 1965-07-27· cited 131×
- In Re Integration of the Nebraska State Bar Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court· 1937-09-20· cited 130×
- State v. CliftonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1965-02-23· cited 47×
- County of Dane v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court· 1861-04-10· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.