State v. Rush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Applying the exclusionary rule to sentencing would also unduly restrict a trial court's access to a broad range of evidence in determining a proper sentence.\
• \Applying the exclusionary rule to sentencing would also unduly restrict a trial court's access to a broad range of evidence in determining a proper sentence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• Williams v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
• Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1968-10-07· cited 175×
• State v. Woods
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1984-03-27· cited 131×
• United States v. Joseph F. Schipani
  Second Circuit· 1970-12-10· cited 125×
• Elias v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1980-01-08· cited 106×
• United States v. Bernard Jerome Lee, A/K/A James Wesley Carter
  Fourth Circuit· 1976-05-17· cited 99×
• United States v. Gerald Duane Vandemark
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-07-10· cited 78×
• Turner v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1970-02-24· cited 8×