State v. Rupp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding direct examination of 1 See Idaho Code §§ 18-6609, 18-1507A, 18-1508A. 6 witness by defense counsel did not open the door to Rule 404(b) evidence because the core of the question did not imply a character trait of the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Shepherd
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1993-07-02· cited 32×
• State v. Barcella
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2000-09-18· cited 25×
• State v. Harvey
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2006-02-07· cited 11×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Lawrence
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1986-12-31· cited 51×
• State v. Winkler
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1987-04-30· cited 41×
• State v. Roach
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-12-12· cited 38×
• State v. Boehner
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-06-21· cited 16×