Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/9/2026
State v. Runyon
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 776
Syllabus
The trial court did not provide the defendant with the necessary notifications required by R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) regarding the indefinite nature of his sentence, which resulted in reversible error and the matter was remanded for resentencing on this limited issue. WITH DISSENTING OPINION.
Judges: Siebert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 724×
- State v. Quarterman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-09-23· cited 582×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 536×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. Dean (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-10-27· cited 243×
- State v. Sergent (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-27· cited 162×
- State v. Gwynne (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-11-21· cited 160×
- State v. WestOhio Supreme Court· 2022-05-11· cited 92×
- State v. Patrick (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-22· cited 85×
- State v. HodgkinOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-19· cited 68×
- State v. HarpOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-11· cited 60×
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-10· cited 15×
- State v. PaulOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-10· cited 12×
- State v. Brown SuberOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-06· cited 11×
- State v. CastroOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-05· cited 5×
- State v. LawsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-17· cited 4×
- State v. MauchOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-10· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.