State v. Runyon

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 5039

Syllabus

FELONY SENTENCING; R.C. 2953.08(G)(2); R.C. 2929.11; R.C. 2929.12; CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES; R.C. 2929.14(C)(3); PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; R.C. 2951.03(B)(5). The defendant-appellant's sentence is not contrary to law because it is within the sentencing range and the trial court properly considered R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12. The trial court was not required to make a finding under R.C. 2951.03(B)(5) because the defendant-appellant did not challenge any factual inconsistences in the presentence-investigation report. The trial court's consecutive-sentence findings are not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record and the defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are not contrary to law.