New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 11/21/1996

State v. Rue

Citations

296 N.J. Super. 108
686 A.2d 348
1996 N.J. Super. LEXIS 488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

ruling that no Bielkiewicz charge was necessary in a situation in which the evidence showed that the defendant either \participated in the vicious beating of the victim\ or, conversely, remained in a car and did not take part in the offense
finding no accomplice liability charge was warranted where the prosecution was based on \defendant's culpability . . . as a principal\ and defendant maintained he \was not guilty of a crime at all\
finding accomplice liability charge not warranted where prosecution was based on \defendant's culpability . . . as a principal\ for one defendant and the other defendant \was not guilty of a crime at all\
\The difference between this case and Bielkiewicz is that the evidence in that case could have supported a finding that defendant Bielkiewicz did not share [the principal's] homicidal state of mind.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Long

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.