State v. Rudolfo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the third requirement is objective in that it focuses on the hypothetical behavior of a reasonable person acting under the same circumstances as the defendant.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• describing the EMDA as “a detailed set of guidelines for both the courts and the [DOC] to administer in the ultimate determination of a prisoner’s eligibility for good time reductions from his period of confinement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).