State v. Rudd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[w]e have further rejected the view that an in-court discussion of whether the [requested] charge was warranted, held immediately before the court’s charge to the jury, is an acceptable alternative to the rules of practice” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jefferson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-05-26· cited 7×
• State v. Joseph
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-08-11· cited 5×
• State v. Arroyo
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-10-09· cited 3×
• State v. Marsha P.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-02-15· cited 3×
• State v. Robert B.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-10-06· cited 2×
• Shook v. Eastern Connecticut Health Network, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-06-20· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Whistnant
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-02-12· cited 230×
• State v. Decaro
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-02-29· cited 92×
• State v. Tomasko
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-23· cited 73×
• State v. McIntosh
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-03-18· cited 59×
• State v. Hall
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-01-30· cited 55×
• State v. Jacobs
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-31· cited 30×
• State v. McPhee
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-07-04· cited 16×
• State v. Payne
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-05-25· cited 9×